Ask a man where his dating app time goes and he will say the swiping. It is rarely true. The swiping takes minutes.
Where it actually goes is the women he never decided about. Not the ones he wanted, not the ones he ruled out, the middle group. She is a bit far. She is a bit young. She says she is not looking for anything serious and you are. She seems lovely and something is slightly off and you cannot name it.
Those conversations do not end. They just continue, at a low level, for months.
Why the middle group is so expensive
A clear no costs you nothing. You read the profile, you move on, you have lost four seconds.
A maybe costs you every day it stays open. It gets answered, thought about, revisited on a Sunday. It occupies the part of your attention that was supposed to go to somebody you were actually excited about, and it does it quietly enough that you never notice the bill arriving.
Worse, maybes gather. Five of them running at once looks like a healthy pipeline and produces nothing, because none of them is close enough to be worth an evening and none of them is far enough to close out. So you sit at a full inbox and an empty calendar and conclude the apps do not work.
Why closing one out yourself is so hard
Two honest reasons, and neither is laziness.
The first is that saying a proper no to a real person who has been nice to you feels unpleasant, so men avoid the sentence by letting the thread go slow instead. That is worse for her than the sentence would have been. She is left checking a conversation that is not going anywhere while the man on the other end has privately decided and not mentioned it.
The second is scarcity. When dates are rare, ruling anybody out feels reckless. A man with one warm conversation will hold on to a woman he knows is wrong, because the alternative in his head is nothing at all. That maths only changes when there is a steady supply, and until it changes, every maybe looks too valuable to drop.
The sorting happens before the conversation, not after
The first move is to have decided in advance what almost means for you, which is a different exercise from listing what you want.
You already said who you are looking for. Her age, where she lives, how she lives, what she is on there for. The useful extra step is saying which of those you would actually bend on and which you would not. Fifteen minutes on that question saves weeks, because it turns a vague feeling of nearly into a decision anyone can make on your behalf at eight in the morning without calling you.
The three kinds of almost
Once those terms exist, the near misses sort themselves into three groups, and only one is worth carrying.
The first is wrong on something that will not change. She wants something casual and you want the other thing. She is moving abroad in two months. She has been clear that she does not want children and you are certain you do. Nothing in that improves with more messaging. It is a no now and it will be a more painful no in six weeks, so it gets closed out warmly and immediately.
The second is wrong on something circumstantial. She lives forty minutes away. Her week is brutal until the end of the month. She is out of the country for three weeks. None of that says anything about whether you would enjoy each other, and every bit of it is solvable with a bit of planning. Those get carried, with a plan rather than a drift: a specific day when she is back, not a promise to reconnect at some point.
The third is the honest unknown. Her profile is thin, she writes shortly, nothing is wrong and nothing is obviously right. You cannot tell from a page, and no amount of further messaging will tell you either. Those get taken to a short first drink rather than resolved by text, because an hour in person settles what three weeks of typing cannot.
What actually happens to each one
The ones in the first group get a real reply that does not leave her waiting. Friendly, clear, no explanation of your requirements, no apology paragraph. It takes one message and it is the kindest thing available.
The ones in the second group stay open with a date attached to them, and somebody remembers to pick them up on the right day, which is the part that fails when you are running it yourself between meetings.
The ones in the third group get an invitation sooner rather than later, because the invitation is the only thing that resolves them.
And the whole pile gets looked at regularly rather than accumulating. A conversation with nothing in it and no plan gets closed out rather than left to decay, so the pipeline you have is made of real things instead of things that are technically still alive.
What you stop doing
You stop carrying five women you are unsure about. You stop rereading a thread on a Sunday evening trying to work out whether you like her. You stop being the man who went quiet on somebody who was perfectly pleasant to you.
What reaches you instead is a shorter list and a fuller calendar, which is the trade most men would have made years earlier if the middle group had not felt like the safe place to keep everything.
Our team redoes your photos and your whole profile, then runs the apps against the terms you set, carries the ones worth carrying and closes the rest out properly. Your first date within a week, or we keep working.
If your inbox is mostly women you have not decided about, see if you qualify and we will go through how the Online Dating Concierge handles the near misses.
Written by Matthew Stevens, Co-Founder & Head Coach. More than half a decade coaching men across the US and worldwide.
Everything here comes out of real coaching work: the approaches, dates, texts and profiles we go through with the men we coach.
More from the library6 related articles
- 01Why a Team Says No to Matches You Would Have Swiped Right On5m
- 02Why Busy Professionals Struggle With Dating Apps5m
- 03How a Team Handles Matches Who Want to Meet Tonight5m
- 04What to Say When She Asks How You Have Time for the Apps5m
- 05What a Matchmaker Does and What a Dating Apps Team Does5m
- 06What Happens to the Matches You Never Replied To5m