You have already made this exact decision four or five times and did not lose a night's sleep over any of them.
Somebody else cleans your place. Somebody else does your books. Somebody else handles the shirts, the car, the flights, and in a lot of cases the calendar itself. None of those were hard calls. You did the arithmetic once, it came out clearly, and you never went back to it.
The dating apps are the last thing on that list you still do by hand, and they get judged by a completely different standard for reasons that have nothing to do with arithmetic.
The test you already use
Whenever you hand something over, you run three questions, usually in about nine seconds.
How many hours a week does this actually take me? Would somebody doing it full time do it at least as well? And is the hour I do it in a decent hour, or the worst one I have left?
That is the whole test. If it eats real hours, somebody else would do it at least as well, and you only ever get to it late and tired, you hand it over. You have never needed a fourth question.
Run the apps through it
Take the first one honestly, which means looking at your screen time rather than your impression of yourself. Most men who check land somewhere between forty minutes and two hours a day across the apps, and almost none of them would have guessed that number. Call it an hour. That is seven hours a week and about thirty a month, which is more time than you give several things you already pay someone else to handle.
Second question. Would a team doing this all day do it at least as well as you do? On the parts that decide the outcome, it is not close. Not because you are bad at it, but because the parts that matter are volume and timing, and you have neither. Photos you cannot judge from inside your own face. A reply while the window is open instead of at eleven at night. An evening proposed on Tuesday rather than postponed to a quieter week.
Third question, and this is the one that settles it. When do you actually do it? In a taxi. Between two meetings. In bed at half past eleven with the light off, having already decided you will deal with it properly tomorrow. That is not your good hour. It is the hour you had left over, which is exactly why the results look the way they do.
Three for three. On any other thing in your life this would have been handed over years ago.
So why this one feels different
Because it does not feel like admin. It feels like the thing itself.
Nobody believes hiring a cleaner means they failed at cleaning. But a man handing over the apps has a quiet sense that meeting women is supposed to be something he does personally, and that paying for any part of it counts against him.
It is worth sitting with that for a second, because it does not survive being said out loud. You are not paying somebody to be interested in you. You are paying for the part that happens on a screen at midnight while you are asleep: the filtering, the writing, the answering, the asking. She is meeting you on Thursday, at a bar, on your own. That has not moved an inch.
What is genuinely not delegable
The evening. All of it.
Nobody can turn up as you. Nobody can be funny at the table on your behalf or decide whether you want to see her again. Every hour of work that gets handed over is an hour that was never going to be spent with a woman anyway, because it was spent on a phone deciding who you might one day be in a room with.
That is the whole trade and it is not subtle. You are not buying dates. You are buying back the thirty hours a month sitting between you and them.
What it actually looks like
Our team redoes your photos, built from ordinary selfies with nothing hired and no afternoon lost, and rebuilds your whole profile around them. Then the apps get run every day, on every app you want to be on, the selective ones such as Raya, The League, Luxy or Inner Circle included, on the accounts you already hold.
Interest gets read against the terms you set. The women who fit get real messages in your register. An evening gets proposed while the window is still open, and the whole thing keeps getting adjusted against what is actually producing dates rather than what sounded right at the start.
Your first date within a week, or we keep working. After that the target is 2-3 dates each week.
The only version of this question worth asking
Not whether it is a lot. You have no way to judge that in the abstract and neither does anybody else.
Ask what the last twelve months bought you instead. Take your hours a week, multiply by fifty, and set the number beside the dates that actually landed in your calendar over the same stretch. Everybody knows roughly what their number is and almost nobody has written it down.
If that ratio looks fine to you, you are getting good value and you should carry on exactly as you are. If it looks like what most men find when they check, the spending decision was made a long time ago. You have been paying for this in evenings.
See if you qualify and we will put your real numbers against it, or read what the Online Dating Concierge covers first.
Written by Matthew Stevens, Co-Founder & Head Coach. More than half a decade coaching men across the US and worldwide.
Everything here comes out of real coaching work: the approaches, dates, texts and profiles we go through with the men we coach.
More from the library6 related articles
- 01How Private Is It to Have Someone Run Your Dating Apps5m
- 02Why Wanting Your Dating Apps Run for You Is Not Giving Up5m
- 03Why Handing Over Your Dating Apps Is Easier to Reverse Than You Think5m
- 04When It Makes Sense to Run Your Own Apps Again5m
- 05Are Paid Dating App Subscriptions Worth It5m
- 06Dating Apps When You Are Ready to Get Serious and Have No Time to Look5m