It reads like a line on a page, so most men skim past it. Then they picture a coach somewhere checking spelling, decide it is decoration, and go back to asking about results.
It is worth stopping on, because it is the difference between two arrangements that look identical from the outside and produce completely different months.
What is actually being supervised
Not the typing. The decisions.
Running a man's dating apps is a long series of small judgment calls, and almost none of them are about wording. Which of the forty women who came up today are worth real attention. When a conversation is warm enough to ask her out. What to do with a thread that was going well and went quiet on Thursday. What to say when she asks something about him that he has not told anybody yet.
Those calls decide whether a month produces four dates or none. A coach is over them because he has watched hundreds of conversations go the two different ways and knows which one this is.
The four calls that decide everything
Almost every thread that dies, dies on one of these.
Who gets the attention. A man's apps will happily fill up with pleasant conversations that were never going to become an evening. Spending the week on those feels productive and produces nothing. Choosing correctly here is most of the job.
When to ask. Ask too early and she has not decided she wants to meet you yet. Wait too long and the conversation becomes the relationship, which is where most dating app threads go to die. The right moment is usually earlier than it feels and there are signs that it has arrived.
What to do with silence. She stopped answering. There is a version of the follow up that brings a conversation back and a version that ends it for good, and the difference is not obvious until somebody has shown you both.
What to do when it gets personal. She asks what he does, or why he is on here, or something sharper. That answer has to be his, has to be true, and has to not read like a form being filled in.
What it looks like when nobody is watching
This is the failure mode, and it is not laziness. It is a team working hard at the wrong target.
Messages go out. Replies come back. The numbers look busy. Every conversation is polite and answered promptly and nothing about it is wrong, and at the end of three weeks there are no dates on the calendar.
That happens when the work is measured by activity instead of by outcomes. An inbox gets cleared every day. Nobody ever asks the woman out, because asking risks the conversation, and a conversation that is still alive looks better on a list than a date that got declined.
Supervision is what stops that. Somebody senior looking at threads and asking why this one has run eleven exchanges without anybody suggesting a drink.
It does not mean a coach writes every message
Worth being straight about, because the phrase can be read as bigger than it is.
A coach is not typing every reply. What he does is set the standard the messages are written to, look at the work, and take the calls that need judgment. A thread that is unusual comes to him. A pattern that is going wrong gets corrected once rather than fifty times.
That is how it works in any trade with an apprentice in it. The senior man is not doing all the work. He is the reason the work is any good.
Why you cannot check this yourself
You can read every message sent in your name, and you should, for the first fortnight at least. What reading them will not tell you is what did not happen.
You cannot see the woman who should have been asked out on Tuesday. You cannot see the eight conversations that were opened with women who were never a fit for you. You cannot see the follow up that should have been sent on Saturday and never was, because there is nothing there to read.
The gaps are where the results go, and gaps are exactly what an untrained eye cannot spot in a conversation log. That is the case for somebody experienced looking at it, and it is the reason this is not just a staffing question.
The other thing it catches
Drift.
You said at the start who you actually wanted to meet. Age, part of the city, what you are looking for, the kind of woman you would clear a Thursday for. Six weeks in, without anybody deciding to, the messages have wandered toward whoever replies quickest, because replies feel like progress.
Somebody has to hold the standards you set against the work being done, and it cannot be the person in the middle of doing it. That is a supervision job too, and it is the one that quietly decides whether the dates you get are dates you wanted.
What you are actually paying for
Our team redoes your dating photos and your whole profile, then swipes and texts for you until dates are booked on your calendar, and a coach is over the calls that team is making. Your standards, your facts, your first date within a week, or we keep working.
Anybody can clear an inbox. The judgment is the part that puts a woman across the table from you on Thursday.
Written by Matthew Stevens, Co-Founder & Head Coach. More than half a decade coaching men across the US and worldwide.
Everything here comes out of real coaching work: the approaches, dates, texts and profiles we go through with the men we coach.
More from the library6 related articles
- 01What Coaching Calls Add When a Team Already Runs Your Apps5m
- 02How a Team Keeps Two Matches From Landing on the Same Night5m
- 03What a Managed Dating Apps Pipeline Actually Looks Like3m
- 04Setting Real Dating Standards a Team Can Actually Execute5m
- 05What Actually Happens When Someone Else Runs Your Dating Apps5m
- 06What a Team Does on the Apps That You Would Never Do at 11pm5m