Some of it is real, some of it is invented, and a lot of it sits in between: true for one man in one city, then passed along as true for every man. You cannot sort it by how confident it sounds. You can sort it with five checks, and then you can test whatever survives against your own numbers.
What "fake" actually means
Fake advice comes in a few kinds, and they are not equally harmful.
The first is made up. Someone posts a story about a perfect first message that got a perfect reply, and nobody can check it. A screenshot proves a woman wrote something. It says nothing about the man, how many others failed, or whether the exchange happened as described.
The second is real but misapplied. A tip worked for a man with excellent photos in a big city and gets repeated to a man with ordinary photos in a small town.
The third is sold. The person giving the advice earns money if you believe it, and the advice points toward the thing they sell.
The fourth is honest and wrong. A man genuinely believes his theory and has never tested it.
Why forums and comment sections are hard
a dating coach puts it plainly: many of the people posting advice online are busy posting advice, not busy having happy relationships. The source matters, and an anonymous username tells you nothing about the source.
Add two more problems. You see the loudest voices, and men whose dating is going fine have little reason to write about it. And everything sounds equally sure. A guess and a tested result read the same, and a high vote count measures how many people liked a reply, not whether it works.
The five checks
Before you act on a tip, ask five things.
Can you see results? Does the person show men they actually helped, with details you could verify, or only claims?
Do they say how they know? "This works" is a claim. "I sent this to a hundred women and counted" is a method.
Is it specific enough to test? "Be confident" cannot be tested. "Put a clear daylight photo of your face first" can.
Do they say when it fails? Real advice has limits, and anyone who has done this knows where a tip stops working.
Does it agree with itself? If one reply says swipe on everyone and the next says be selective, one of them is wrong, and you can check which with your own numbers.
Advice that tends to hold up
Some things come up again and again in coaching material because they work for most men.
Photos matter first, because if a woman swipes left on the first one she never reads the rest. a dating coach says a good photo makes up for a lot, and that it is more about how you look in the shot than about your features: light, clothes, angle. He notes you might take many photos and use two.
Being selective helps. a dating coach says apps read a man who likes everyone as unselective, and often as less attractive.
A first message that refers to something on her page works better than a generic one, and getting from the first message to a plan in a handful of messages beats weeks of chat.
Notice these are all things you can check. That is not an accident.
Advice to be careful with
Anything that promises a result. Dating depends on the woman, the app, your city and a dozen things nobody controls.
Anything that cannot be tested. If you could never tell whether it worked, you could never tell whether it failed.
Anything that blames one side completely. "The apps are rigged against you" and "it is all your fault" are both too tidy. a dating coach says apps are businesses that benefit from keeping you on them, and that is a reason to use them carefully, not a reason to give up.
How to test a tip
Pick one tip. Change that one thing and nothing else. Run it for a week or two and count: likes to matches, matches to replies, replies to plans.
If the numbers move, keep it. If they do not, drop it without arguing. One man's story on one app in one city does not transfer, and your own count is the only evidence that applies to you.
Where real advice comes from
Your own data first. Where your likes turn into matches, where matches go quiet and where conversations stall is the most honest feedback you will get, and it is free.
After that, look for people who have worked with many men, explain their reasoning and can describe a failure as well as a success.
We coach men for a living, so apply the same five checks to us. The test is whether what we say makes your own numbers move.
Written by Matthew Stevens, Co-Founder & Head Coach. More than half a decade coaching men across the US and worldwide.
Everything here comes out of real coaching work: the approaches, dates, texts and profiles we go through with the men we coach.