The honest answer is that it depends entirely on whether your profile already works, and you can find that out before you spend a cent.
What the money actually buys
Strip the tiers back and the paid features fall into three groups.
The first is more of what the free version rations: more likes a day, and being shown to more people. The second is information, mainly seeing which women have already liked you instead of finding out by accident. The third is control, like undoing a swipe or changing which city you show up in before a trip.
Notice what none of them do. Not one changes your photos, your bio, or the message you send her. Every paid feature is about how many people reach your profile, or how efficiently you spend your own attention. The profile itself is the same profile it was this morning.
Why that makes it a multiplier
Because paying does not touch what she sees, it multiplies whatever your profile already does.
If a reasonable share of the women who see you swipe back, then putting you in front of twice as many women gives you twice as many matches. The profile was already doing its job and the daily cap was the thing in the way.
If almost nobody swipes back, twice as many views gives you twice as much of almost nothing. You have paid to be passed over by a larger crowd.
That single difference explains why two men on the same subscription have completely opposite opinions about it. They are not disagreeing about the product. They have different profiles.
Find out which man you are, for free
Run the free version properly for two weeks and write down two numbers: roughly how many of the women you like match back, and how many of those matches reply when you message first.
If a fair share of your likes match, your profile works and the like cap is genuinely holding you back. Paying buys more of a thing that is already converting, which is the only situation where a subscription is obviously worth it.
If barely anyone matches, a subscription buys a bigger sample of the same result. Go fix the photos instead. That can cost nothing at all, because the most useful fix is usually deciding which photo sits first.
The two features that are worth it on their own terms
A couple of them are different from the rest, because they save your time rather than buying you exposure.
Seeing who has already liked you is the useful one. It lets you spend your attention on women who have already said yes, which turns an hour of swiping into ten minutes of sorting. If time is the scarce thing in your week, that is where the money goes furthest.
Changing your location before you travel is the other. If you are in a city for four days, starting conversations the week before you land is the difference between a date on the trip and a match you never get around to meeting.
Three ways the money goes nowhere
Boosts bought at random. A boost is a short burst of extra exposure, so buying one on a Tuesday afternoon spends it on whoever happens to be in the app on a Tuesday afternoon. If you are going to use them, use them when the apps are busiest, which is in the evening.
Paying on three apps at once. Men do this when results are slow, and it triples the cost of a problem that usually lives in the one photo set all three accounts share.
Paying instead of fixing. This is the expensive one, because it is comfortable. A subscription is a small monthly bill that quietly stands in for the afternoon of work that would have actually changed the result.
The order to spend in
Spend in this order and you will not waste much.
First, the free changes. Which photo is first, cutting the two weakest, and trading the label lines in your bio for something only you could have written. None of that costs anything and it is where the biggest change usually is.
Second, better photos, if the honest answer is that yours are poor. A good set is the one purchase that changes what she sees rather than how many people see it.
Third, and only then, a subscription, to buy more volume of something that is already converting.
Most men run that list backwards, then blame the subscription.
When the bill was never the real question
There is a common version of this where the profile is average, the apps get twenty minutes on a Sunday, and no tier on any app fixes either of those things.
That is the case where handing the whole thing over is the cheaper decision rather than the more expensive one. One team redoes the photos and the profile, then runs the apps day to day, replies while conversations are still warm, and works toward dates on your calendar instead of a bigger queue you do not have time to answer. What you are paying for changes from exposure to outcomes.
If you have the hours and the profile is the weak part, fix the profile and keep your money. If the profile is fine and the hours are what you do not have, the subscription was never the thing standing in your way.
Written by Matthew Stevens, Co-Founder & Head Coach. More than half a decade coaching men across the US and worldwide.
Everything here comes out of real coaching work: the approaches, dates, texts and profiles we go through with the men we coach.
More from the library6 related articles
- 01What to Do When a Date You Set From an App Flakes5m
- 02Do You Need a Photographer for Your Dating App Photos5m
- 03How Many Prompts Should You Fill Out on Your Profile5m
- 04Keep Changing Your Profile Until the Right Women Respond3m
- 05Are Dating App Super Likes Worth Using5m
- 06Do You Approve Every Match Before a Team Reaches Out on Your Behalf5m